We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sample output reported by a user when NavX and REV were running in simulation together:
I just found an issue with the print statements before the simulator runs. A navx print got mixed up with one for the spark max and this happened:
na[vCX-ASenN SPARsK MAoXr] Connected. nUanvaX-blSee ntso roetrri esvtaer tSupP AiRKni MtAiXa lfiziatrimware version for CAN ID: 1. Pleasoen veanrdify the dev iscetIDa frtiueld matcp chaleisb rattihoen ccoonfmigpulrede CAtNe. InD ofav Xt-hSeen scoontrr oollnboerard ,st aand rtup tchat althe coinbtrroller is connectedation comp to the CAN Bus. l[eCtANe .S navX-Sensor Yaw angle aPutAoR-resetK tMoA X0]. 0W due to sPItarLtiubp coalri bEration. xternal
It would be useful if NavX used a logger that could be hooked instead of printf(). There's one in wpiutil and/or ntcore that would fit the bill.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Sample output reported by a user when NavX and REV were running in simulation together:
It would be useful if NavX used a logger that could be hooked instead of printf(). There's one in wpiutil and/or ntcore that would fit the bill.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: