You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note how this aligns reasonably well to 4 bytes and how coordinated & domains starts at a fixed point in the structure, making scanning deterministic and hopefully fast. The sample structure uses 92 bytes, down from 239 bytes. If represented as base64 when loading it becomes 122 bytes or about half.
The current data structure with nodes-information is list of JSON-blocks, e.g.
Switching to a single string/entry would minimize the number of objects on the head and still be unambiguous:
Switching to integer-coordinates by multiplying with 1000
and switching to base64 encoding for all integers should pack this further.
TODO: Provide a sample of base64-encoded integers below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: