You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Feature request:
Ability to configure the targetPort of the interceptor-proxy service to have it listen on port 80
Workarounds:
Set the interceptor.proxy.port to 80 and run the container as root
Patch the targetPort after helm install
Use-Case
I would like the interceptor proxy service to listen on port 80 to avoid the need to change existing urls. These urls are now pointing via an ExternalName-Service to the keda-interceptor-proxy
Is this a feature you are interested in implementing yourself?
Yes
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I guess that we could use different values for each usage, but we need to keep the current behavior as default. I mean, if the new value isn't given, we should use the current one.
Could you open a PR with the change?
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
stalebot
added
the
stale
All issues that are marked as stale due to inactivity
label
Nov 5, 2024
Proposal
Feature request:
Ability to configure the targetPort of the interceptor-proxy service to have it listen on port 80
Workarounds:
Use-Case
I would like the interceptor proxy service to listen on port 80 to avoid the need to change existing urls. These urls are now pointing via an ExternalName-Service to the keda-interceptor-proxy
Is this a feature you are interested in implementing yourself?
Yes
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: