You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With a quick fix that check whether the I- is always the first when there is a change of label, would fix the issue, but this incorrect labelling should not something the DeLFT model should ever output.
<div type="availability">
<div
xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<p>The raw sequencing reads for the metagenomic samples used in this study were downloaded from public repositories listed in the following publications: 10.1038/ nature11209, 10.1038/nature11450, 10.1016/j. cels.2016.10.004, and 10.1101/gr.233940.117. Data underlying all figures, such as the numerical values of bar plots, can be found in 10.5281/ zenodo.10304481. All other metadata, as well as the source code for the sequencing pipeline, downstream analyses, and figure generation are available at Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.10368227) or GitHub (
<ref type="url" target="https://github.com/zhiru-liu/microbiome_evolution">https://github.com/zhiru-liu/microbiome_ evolution</ref>).
</p>
</div>
</div>
I'm having a strange mis-classification from the DL model (the CRF works better, in this specific case).
The sequence labelling changes but the new sequence does not start with
I-
:Here the larger context:
The portion of the abstract that is mis-classified is then dumped on the floor.
PDF: journal.pbio.3002472.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: