-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define what to report in compatibles for non arm devices #478
Comments
Yes, and it cannot be the |
Maybe we could have a composition of a few of those? |
Yeah, we can pick a bunch of files we like and convert them into correspondingly-named fields under
|
If it's possible that |
Ideally, retrieval of this info should be done on the machine before test execution, but prefilling Maestro HW database with these would also work, similar to how you set |
@helen-fornazier, @nuclearcat, the sooner we agree on a plan, the sooner I can start writing the schema and the proposal, and working on the implementation. It's obvious, of course, just wanted to let you know, that I'm waiting on you 😁 |
We need to think about what to report on compatible for x86, otherwise we get hardware unknown https://staging.dashboard.kernelci.org:9000/tree/6fb2fa9805c501d9ade047fc511961f3273cdcb5/test[…]3A%226fb2fa9805c501d9ade047fc511961f3273cdcb5%22%7D
and it is hard to understand from the main page which are the boards that are failing to boot
example: https://staging.dashboard.kernelci.org:9000/tree/6fb2fa9805c501d9ade047fc511961f3273cdcb5?tabl[…]3A%226fb2fa9805c501d9ade047fc511961f3273cdcb5%22%7D
cc @nuclearcat @spbnick @JenySadadia @padovan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: