Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow extension of models etc. #6

Open
kezabelle opened this issue Jan 6, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Allow extension of models etc. #6

kezabelle opened this issue Jan 6, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@kezabelle
Copy link
Owner

I may have a need for doing per-SITE_ID config at some point soon. It'd be nice if I could rework it so the root model is abstract and concrete, and all the usages of the model are replaceable with N effort.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Allow easily subclassing the Middleware to replace the mode…
33f623c 
…l used by the wrapper.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Convert the existing model definition (i.e.: the required i…
94e1e50 
…mplementation) to an abstract model and subclass it.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Allow easily replacing the model passed to the registry by …
e43aa17 
…an AppConfig by just changing the get_stagesetting_model method.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Allow replacing the context processor easily, though it som…
f7f893b 
…etimes assumes the middleware has also been appropriately replaced.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Move the key from the base abstract model I created, over t…
7b807b5 
…o the concrete implementation, so it can be non-unique subsequently.
kezabelle added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2016
@kezabelle
Refs #6 - Avoid hardcoding the model name all over, so that the logic…
dbe0fbc 
… can be re-used for subsequent models.
@kezabelle
Copy link
Owner Author

I think I may now have enough to attempt per-object (for my purposes, sites.Site) settings.
We'll see how much code that entails, and if I need to abstract further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kezabelle