Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What about referencing object/term maps #82

Closed
chrdebru opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

What about referencing object/term maps #82

chrdebru opened this issue Feb 13, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@chrdebru
Copy link
Contributor

The issue on joins is closed and a "referencing term maps" spec is mentioned, but where is it? The problem being is that the test cases still contain joins and some details need to be worked out.

@DylanVanAssche
Copy link
Collaborator

The ReferenceObjectMap was kept as far as I know, so it should not change much in RML Core.

Please confirm @elsdvlee and @pmaria

@elsdvlee
Copy link
Collaborator

elsdvlee commented Feb 29, 2024

Yes, it was decided in the meeting in Santiago that we will still have referencing object maps in the core.
I also believe that not all issues around referencing object maps are solved. I am esppecially waiting on decision in this issue and the related pull request which I made.

@dachafra
Copy link
Member

dachafra commented Jul 3, 2024

This is already integrated into #74 and #78. I'm going to close the issue but please feel free to open it again if I missed something @chrdebru @elsdvlee

@dachafra dachafra closed this as completed Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants