You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The blog reported that:
"The model was trained on 400B tokens from The Pile dataset with 800GB text."
But I'm confused about this figure, because also in the blog: "Throughput of the 6B GPT-J for training (151k tokens/s) is faster than the 2.7B GPT-Neo (148k tokens/s) on the same hardware (TPU v3-256 pod)", "GPT-J training took roughly five weeks with TPU v3-256."
So shoudn't it be 151k * 3600 * 24 * 7 * 5 = 456G tokens?
I found that the training tokens for gpt-neox-20b also seems to be very small: EleutherAI/gpt-neox#654
Where am I wrong? If gpt-j-6b and gpt-neox-20b were trained with ~1000 times fewer tokens than similar-sized gpt-3 curie (300B tokens), how could they achieve comparable or better eval results than gpt-3 curie?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The blog reported that:
"The model was trained on 400B tokens from The Pile dataset with 800GB text."
But I'm confused about this figure, because also in the blog: "Throughput of the 6B GPT-J for training (151k tokens/s) is faster than the 2.7B GPT-Neo (148k tokens/s) on the same hardware (TPU v3-256 pod)", "GPT-J training took roughly five weeks with TPU v3-256."
So shoudn't it be 151k * 3600 * 24 * 7 * 5 = 456G tokens?
I found that the training tokens for gpt-neox-20b also seems to be very small: EleutherAI/gpt-neox#654
Where am I wrong? If gpt-j-6b and gpt-neox-20b were trained with ~1000 times fewer tokens than similar-sized gpt-3 curie (300B tokens), how could they achieve comparable or better eval results than gpt-3 curie?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: