Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Built-in rules vs. Add-on #10

Open
emyoulation opened this issue Dec 7, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Built-in rules vs. Add-on #10

emyoulation opened this issue Dec 7, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@emyoulation
Copy link

Is there a way to determine and then indicate which rules are Built-in versus which are add-ons?

And will this GUI fail gracefully if a referenced Rule becomes uninstalled?

Perhaps a link to Rules help can be included in the dialog?

Built-in Rules (2 pre-existing help_url options):

Add-on Rules (Table of Contents):

@kkujansuu
Copy link
Owner

Determining which is which is probably possible. But I don't know how to indicate that. Is there really a need for this feature?

@emyoulation
Copy link
Author

emyoulation commented Oct 8, 2022

It probably just needs a graceful way to fail.

Maybe just collate the installed rule list. Then highlight any Rules that don't correlate to those in the installed list. It could display in the same way as a missing custom filter.

The error wording probably should not 'assume' a missing add-on rule. It could be a mismatch Gramps version. A Gramps 6.x filter might have built-in rules that aren't available in 5.1 version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants