Suggest absent type variables

[ghost]

It's easy to forget about type variables when searching, e.g. "List -> Bool" should be "List a -> Bool". Searching for "List -> Bool" just returns "No results found.", I guess because it's not valid Elm. It'd be great if it said "Did you mean List a -> Bool?".

[klaftertief]

Thanks for the input.
Some known core types could be put in a list for special treatment like that, or the search could be more relaxed for type variables. Let me think about this a bit.