AssemblyScript exploratory projects
| Project | Description |
|---|---|
| as-fib | Implementation of a fibonacci algorithm using AssemblyScript |
| wat-fib | Same as as-fib but hand coded wat - see CODING FIBONACCI IN WEBASSEMBLY BY HAND |
| as-types | Shows unboxing record types for enum and class |
At the repo root run these commands to execute the tests.
Note as-explore is a monorepo that relies on pnpm.
$ pnpm install
$ pnpm build
$ pnpm test
There are 2 sets of benchmark suites available in as-fib/benchmarks/index.js.
They compare the execution characteristics of running the AssemblyScript-based wasm implementations (from as-fib/assembly/index.ts) and the exact same code written in JavaScript from as-fib/assembly/index.js.
| Suite | Operation |
|---|---|
| fibonacciSuites | Runs fib(N) using the looping fibonacci implementations |
| fibRecurseSuites | Runs fib(N) using the recursive fibonacci implementations |
Each set of suites run fib(3) and fib(25) for relative comparison.
$ pnpm benchmark
> [email protected] benchmark <snip>/as-explore
> pnpm --filter as-fib benchmark
> [email protected] benchmark <snip>/as-explore/packages/as-fib
> node benchmarks
Running fibonacci_3
AssemblyScript x 138,459,877 ops/sec ±1.32% (96 runs sampled)
JavaScript x 189,202,922 ops/sec ±0.25% (93 runs sampled)
JavaScript won.
Running fibonacci_25
AssemblyScript x 74,344,527 ops/sec ±0.77% (95 runs sampled)
JavaScript x 44,296,659 ops/sec ±0.35% (95 runs sampled)
AssemblyScript won.
Running fibRecurse_3
AssemblyScript x 58,730,650 ops/sec ±0.41% (94 runs sampled)
JavaScript x 47,499,009 ops/sec ±0.33% (94 runs sampled)
AssemblyScript won.
Running fibRecurse_25
AssemblyScript x 1,683 ops/sec ±0.43% (98 runs sampled)
JavaScript x 927 ops/sec ±0.33% (95 runs sampled)
AssemblyScript won.