You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be helpful to support --limit 0. This would allow the user to request zero records output, and consequently the user could use this option to get the column headers, and only the column headers.
Currently --limit 0 behaves identically to --limit -1 (the default) which outputs all records. This behavior (outputting all records when limit is zero) is actually a by-product of another minor bug, which is the following test:
if n == limit:
break
This test happens after n has been incremented and consequently will never break when limit is zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be helpful to support --limit 0. This would allow the user to request zero records output, and consequently the user could use this option to get the column headers, and only the column headers.
Currently --limit 0 behaves identically to --limit -1 (the default) which outputs all records. This behavior (outputting all records when limit is zero) is actually a by-product of another minor bug, which is the following test:
This test happens after n has been incremented and consequently will never break when limit is zero.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: