Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

P0332 confusing statement in one section, and do we need more conversion examples? #64

Open
crtrott opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@crtrott
Copy link
Member

crtrott commented Feb 12, 2018

Proposed: [dcl.array] 11.3.4 Arrays, p3

There is a thing which starts with "In addition" which is confusing. How is it "in addition" if we just said "any" bound can be omitted. Maybe it should be more something like: "If only the first of the constant expressions that specify the bounds of the arrays is omitted, the incomplete array type may be used: "​

Also do we want to have a more complete example catalogue for matching? Though all the other ones are probably not ambiguous.

Otherwise this looks much better than before. I would be convinced ;-)

hcedwar added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant