Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Not compatible with jackson-module-kotlin v2.16.0 #526

Open
florianmutter opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #527
Open

Not compatible with jackson-module-kotlin v2.16.0 #526

florianmutter opened this issue Nov 17, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #527

Comments

@florianmutter
Copy link

After updating jackson-module-kotlin to v2.16.0 we get the following error:

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'void com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.KotlinModule.<init>(int, boolean, boolean, boolean, com.fasterxml.jackson.module.kotlin.SingletonSupport, boolean, int, kotlin.jvm.internal.DefaultConstructorMarker)'
	at org.ktorm.jackson.JsonSqlTypeKt.<clinit>(JsonSqlType.kt:34)

Seems like jackson-module-kotlin v2.16.0 is not binary compatible to previous versions.

See also FasterXML/jackson-module-kotlin#610 (comment)
@florianmutter florianmutter changed the title Not compatible to jackson 2.16.0 Not compatible with jackson-module-kotlin v2.16.0 Nov 17, 2023
@k163377 k163377 mentioned this issue Nov 18, 2023
Merged
@sam0r040
Copy link

Hi, are there any plans to publish a bugfix release soon?

@maxtar
Copy link

maxtar commented Apr 8, 2024

I have the same problem too. Please fix. :(

@Sir-Gil-Galad
Copy link

I have the same issue. Looking forward for the fix.

@milux
Copy link

milux commented Jun 7, 2024

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fixed a binary compatibility error when using a higher version of KotlinModule k163377/ktorm
5 participants
@milux @maxtar @florianmutter @Sir-Gil-Galad @sam0r040