Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Change partitioning step from duckdb to native pyarrow #28

Open
RaczeQ opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Change partitioning step from duckdb to native pyarrow #28

RaczeQ opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
potential upgrade Something that could be better but it requires testing

Comments

@RaczeQ
Copy link
Collaborator

RaczeQ commented Jan 16, 2024

To test if partitioning with pyarrow is faster than using duckdb PARTITION BY writer.
@RaczeQ RaczeQ added the potential upgrade Something that could be better but it requires testing label Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
potential upgrade Something that could be better but it requires testing
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@RaczeQ