You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There's something a little strange going on in the definitions of cyclic boundaries... as the number of grid points in any direction must be 2^n +1 I've always set the pointIn to be the same number and this is the case in the example protocol file single_species_single_substrate_2D.xml:
However, this leads to agents seemingly off the agent grid... in this case the resolution is 8um and we have many cells with positions between 256um and 264um. Changing the "33" to "32" seems to fix this, but it may be causing other problems that I don't know about.
I'll try to get to the bottom of this eventually, but any help would be appreciated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's something a little strange going on in the definitions of cyclic boundaries... as the number of grid points in any direction must be 2^n +1 I've always set the pointIn to be the same number and this is the case in the example protocol file single_species_single_substrate_2D.xml:
However, this leads to agents seemingly off the agent grid... in this case the resolution is 8um and we have many cells with positions between 256um and 264um. Changing the "33" to "32" seems to fix this, but it may be causing other problems that I don't know about.
I'll try to get to the bottom of this eventually, but any help would be appreciated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: