You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I continued digging around (see #124) and tested using the existing_graph -parameter to link walking and PT graphs together. I found that the stops around transit areas are connected together, but edges that would link stops to road network does not seem to work (as in the example below). Is this expected behavior?
The code that I used to produce the graph is:
G = pt.load_feed_as_graph(feed, start, end,
walk_speed_kmph=walk_speed,
impute_walk_transfers=False,
use_multiprocessing=True,
existing_graph=walk_graph)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When a network is obtained via OSMNX the node IDs are ints, so we want to preserve these ints instead of converting them to strings. Or else, we will be creating hanging nodes and also be ignoring nearest nodes that come from the existing graph. I am submitting this pull request: #164
Hi again @kuanb,
I continued digging around (see #124) and tested using the
existing_graph
-parameter to link walking and PT graphs together. I found that the stops around transit areas are connected together, but edges that would link stops to road network does not seem to work (as in the example below). Is this expected behavior?The code that I used to produce the graph is:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: