Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 6, 2025. It is now read-only.

Consider adding vector.dev as a supported aggregator #8

Closed
pepov opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Consider adding vector.dev as a supported aggregator #8

pepov opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pepov
Copy link
Member

pepov commented May 30, 2023

Vector (vector.dev) has some benefits (performance, VRL language) that could bring value to a logging infrastructure managed by the logging operator.

Things to consider:

  • is there any existing operator that the logging operator could integrate with to avoid reinventing the wheel?
  • is there someone (company or individual) who would pick up the task of adding support and maintaining it?
  • do we want/need a major refactor to be able to add another provider to the aggregation layer? (most probably yes)
@pepov pepov closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant