Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvements in managed route tables #4885

Closed
mtulio opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Improvements in managed route tables #4885

mtulio opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-priority needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@mtulio
Copy link
Contributor

mtulio commented Mar 19, 2024

/kind feature

Describe the solution you'd like
[A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.]

Currently the route tables for managed network (VPC) are created* in the following format:

  • One route table by zone for private subnets
  • Plus one route table by zone when public is enabled

*ignoring the default route table

Deploying in regions with a large amount of zones, like us-east1, it will generate 12 route tables when using full zones(6) for regular availability zones.

When thinking at scale, for example with Local Zones and Wavelength zones (proposal #4874), the number of route tables can grow significantly. When managing (creating subnets) in all zones available in Local Zones (LZ) and Wavelength (WL) on us-east-1, alongside the regular Availability Zones (AZ). There are a total of 37 zones available, it will generate around 74 route tables.

$ aws ec2 describe-availability-zones --region us-east-1 --all-availability-zones --query 'AvailabilityZones[].ZoneName' | jq '. | length'
37

I would like to propose optimization for the public route tables which uses the same default route, instead of creating one public route table by zone. Additionally, for the private route tables, it would be nice to allow more than one subnet to share the same route table to cover the scenarios where the gateway is not supported in the zone, for Example Local Zones (#4874), where the egress traffic from private subnets can use NAT Gateways created in the Region.

Allowing subnets to be associated with more flexibility in the route tables, could decrease the number of tables to be re-conciliated from 74 to 8, using the example above of us-east-1:

(1[Public subnets/AZ and LZ]) + (N*zones [Private subnet AZs]) + (1[Public subnet Carrier]) = 1 + 6 + 1 = 8

Where:

Anything else you would like to add:
[Miscellaneous information that will assist in solving the issue.]

Environment:

  • Cluster-api-provider-aws version:
  • Kubernetes version: (use kubectl version):
  • OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release):
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-priority needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If CAPA/CAPI contributors determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 18, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jul 18, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned".

In response to this:

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Reopen this issue with /reopen
  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/close not-planned

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-priority needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants