Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Memory Manager #1769

Open
18 of 23 tasks
cezaryzukowski opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 113 comments
Open
18 of 23 tasks

Memory Manager #1769

cezaryzukowski opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 113 comments
Assignees
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Milestone

Comments

@cezaryzukowski
Copy link

cezaryzukowski commented May 12, 2020

Enhancement Description

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. label May 12, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cezaryzukowski: The label(s) sig/sig-node cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

/sig sig-node

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

/sig node

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels May 12, 2020
@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

/kind kep
/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels May 12, 2020
@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

/milestone v1.19

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@cezaryzukowski: You must be a member of the kubernetes/milestone-maintainers GitHub team to set the milestone. If you believe you should be able to issue the /milestone command, please contact your and have them propose you as an additional delegate for this responsibility.

In response to this:

/milestone v1.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

Hey there @cezaryzukowski @bg-chun -- 1.19 Enhancements Lead here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating to Alpha in 1.19?

In order to have this part of the release:

  1. The KEP PR must be merged in an implementable state
  2. The KEP must have test plans
  3. The KEP must have graduation criteria.

As an additional note, #1620 merged recently, adding production readiness review questions to the KEP template. We are not making it mandatory for the 1.19 release cycle, but it would be great if the PRR questionnaire is filled since the KEP PR is in flight.

If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 👍

Thanks! 🙂


The current release schedule is:

  • Monday, April 13: Week 1 - Release cycle begins
  • Tuesday, May 19: Week 6 - Enhancements Freeze
  • Thursday, June 25: Week 11 - Code Freeze
  • Thursday, July 9: Week 14 - Docs must be completed and reviewed
  • Tuesday, August 4: Week 17 - Kubernetes v1.19.0 released

@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

@cezaryzukowski @bg-chun -- Unfortunately, the deadline for the 1.19 Enhancement freeze has passed. For now, this is being removed from the milestone and 1.19 tracking sheet. If there is a need to get this in, please file an enhancement exception.

@palnabarun palnabarun added the tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team label May 20, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Aug 18, 2020
@palnabarun
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 1, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Hi @cezaryzukowski @bg-chun !

Enhancements Lead here, do you still intend to do any work on this (alpha/beta/stable) for 1.20?

Thanks!
Kirsten

@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice, yes w plan Alpha for v1.20 as a target.
Should we update the description above?

PS We planned Alpha for v1.19, but we couldn't make it.

@kikisdeliveryservice kikisdeliveryservice added tracked/yes Denotes an enhancement issue is actively being tracked by the Release Team stage/alpha Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Alpha status and removed tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team labels Sep 14, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the update @cezaryzukowski !

As a reminder the KEP PR should also include a kep.yaml file, please see here for the templates:
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/NNNN-kep-template

If you could also update the description to reflect alpha in 1.20 that would be great.

Best,
Kirsten

/milestone v1.20

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.20 milestone Sep 14, 2020
@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

kikisdeliveryservice commented Sep 30, 2020

Hi @cezaryzukowski @bg-chun

As a reminder Enhancements Freeze is next week ** Tuesday October 6th**. By that time your completed KEP PR will need to merge.

If you have any questions, please let me know

Best,
Kirsten

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Update: the PR merged! 👍

@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

@kikisdeliveryservice Many thanks for your support.

Do we need to do anything else beyond "KEP merged" to have this feature in v1.20?

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

Hi @cezaryzukowski at the moment, no. 😄 But you do have to keep to all of the remaining milestone deadlines such as Code Freeze (Nov 12th) and Test Freeze(Nov 23rd) as well as the Docs Placeholder PR deadline of Nov 6th.

As you go forward, also please link all PRs related to this enhancement on this issue.

Lmk if you have any questions!!! I'll be here 😄 and will remind you of upcoming important dates.

@cezaryzukowski
Copy link
Author

cezaryzukowski commented Oct 7, 2020

Hi @kikisdeliveryservice

That's grand, we know the exact schedule.

With respect to "Docs Placeholder PR", is there any template or guideline on how to prepare the docs?

@kikisdeliveryservice
Copy link
Member

kikisdeliveryservice commented Oct 7, 2020

Hi @cezaryzukowski !

So the placeholder PR is very simple. See: https://kubernetes.io/docs/contribute/new-content/new-features/#open-a-placeholder-pr. This tells the docs team that you intend on adding feature documentation. Later on you'll add that full documentation and work with the docs team. You just need to do the placeholder by Nov. 6th but the sooner the better =)

Also, going forward, please link the placeholder PR and any k/k PRs back to this issue so the team can track them.

If you have any questions, let me know 😸

Just to recap:
Upcoming dates:
Friday, Nov 6th: Week 8 - Docs Placeholder PR deadline
Thursday, Nov 12th: Week 9 - Code Freeze
Monday, Nov 23rd: Week 11 - Test Freeze

Thanks!
Kirsten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Oct 12, 2024
@rashansmith
Copy link

Hello @Tal-or 👋 from the v1.32 Communications Team!
We'd love for you to consider writing a feature blog about your enhancement! Some reasons why you might want to write a blog for this feature include (but are not limited to) if this introduces breaking changes, is important to our users, or has been in progress for a long time and is graduating.

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Oct 15, 2024

Hello @Tal-or 👋, 1.32 Docs Shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you!

Hey @michellengnx,

Thanks for reaching out. there's no to update docs because no user-facing changes has been done.
The only change in the doc is maybe changing the feature maturity from beta -> GA

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Oct 15, 2024

Hello @Tal-or 👋 from the v1.32 Communications Team! We'd love for you to consider writing a feature blog about your enhancement! Some reasons why you might want to write a blog for this feature include (but are not limited to) if this introduces breaking changes, is important to our users, or has been in progress for a long time and is graduating.

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

Hey @rashansmith,

Thanks for reaching out. I would like to post a blog indeed.
I'll be back from vacation on 27th Oct 2024 and open a placehodler PR.
Could you please advice what is the deadline for the blog to be completed?

@rashansmith
Copy link

Hello @Tal-or 👋 from the v1.32 Communications Team! We'd love for you to consider writing a feature blog about your enhancement! Some reasons why you might want to write a blog for this feature include (but are not limited to) if this introduces breaking changes, is important to our users, or has been in progress for a long time and is graduating.
To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

Hey @rashansmith,

Thanks for reaching out. I would like to post a blog indeed. I'll be back from vacation on 27th Oct 2024 and open a placehodler PR. Could you please advice what is the deadline for the blog to be completed?

Thanks for the update @Tal-or . Blog review will begin on November 10th, so it should be completed by then. Let me know if you have any more questions!

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @Tal-or 👋, 1.32 Docs Shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for 1.32 require any new docs or modification to existing docs? If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against dev-1.32 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday October 24th 2024 18:00 PDT. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you!

Hey @michellengnx,

Thanks for reaching out. there's no to update docs because no user-facing changes has been done. The only change in the doc is maybe changing the feature maturity from beta -> GA

This is my fault, I misunderstood the requirements. We will still need a PR, albeit likely a trivial one for the reasons above. Filed: kubernetes/website#48494

@jenshu
Copy link

jenshu commented Oct 28, 2024

Hey again @Tal-or 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here.

Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 8th November 2024 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 7th November 2024.

Here's where this enhancement currently stands:

  • All PRs to the Kubernetes repo that are related to your enhancement are linked in the above issue description (for tracking purposes).
  • All PR/s are ready to be merged (they have approved and lgtm labels applied) by the code freeze deadline. This includes tests.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

Also, please let me know if there are other PRs in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP.
As always, we are here to help if any questions come up. Thanks!

@jenshu jenshu moved this from Tracked for enhancements freeze to At risk for code freeze in 1.32 Enhancements Tracking Oct 28, 2024
@rashansmith
Copy link

Hello @Tal-or !

Just reaching out to remind you to author your feature blog!

To opt-in, let us know and open a Feature Blog placeholder PR against the website repository by 30th Oct 2024. For more information about writing a blog see the blog contribution guidelines.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions.

Tal-or added a commit to Tal-or/website that referenced this issue Oct 28, 2024
WIP.
Initial commit in order to have a
feature blog placeholder PR

see: kubernetes/enhancements#1769 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <[email protected]>
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Oct 28, 2024

Hello @rashansmith

I opened a placeholder PR kubernetes/website#48578
Will continue the work during this week.

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Oct 28, 2024

Thank you @jenshu for the reminder.

For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):

I do not have permission to edit the original issue description. we're tracking the recent work here:
#1769 (comment)

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@ffromani WDYT?

Also, please let me know if there are other PRs in k/k we should be tracking for this KEP.

At this point there's none.

@jenshu
Copy link

jenshu commented Oct 28, 2024

I do not have permission to edit the original issue description. we're tracking the recent work here:
#1769 (comment)

@Tal-or thanks, I've updated the issue description to add the missing PR

@ffromani
Copy link
Contributor

If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance.

@ffromani WDYT?

Too early to tell. Let's reconvene after sig-node meeting 2024/Oct/29

Tal-or added a commit to Tal-or/website that referenced this issue Oct 29, 2024
WIP.
Initial commit in order to have a
feature blog placeholder PR

see: kubernetes/enhancements#1769 (comment)

Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <[email protected]>
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Nov 4, 2024

ffromani added a commit to ffromani/website that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2024
Docs update for the Kubelet Memory Manager GA graduation
Issue: kubernetes/enhancements#1769

Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <[email protected]>
ffromani added a commit to ffromani/website that referenced this issue Nov 5, 2024
Docs update for the Kubelet Memory Manager GA graduation
Issue: kubernetes/enhancements#1769

Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <[email protected]>
ffromani added a commit to ffromani/website that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2024
Docs update for the Kubelet Memory Manager GA graduation
Issue: kubernetes/enhancements#1769

Signed-off-by: Francesco Romani <[email protected]>
@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Nov 7, 2024

Hello @rashansmith,

The blog is ready for review: kubernetes/website#48578

@haircommander haircommander moved this from Tracked to Implemented in SIG Node 1.32 KEPs planning Nov 7, 2024
@jenshu
Copy link

jenshu commented Nov 8, 2024

Hello @Tal-or 👋, v1.32 Enhancements team here.

With all the implementation (code related) PRs merged as per the issue description:

This enhancement is now marked as tracked for code freeze for the v1.32 Code Freeze!

Please note that KEPs targeting stable need to have the status field marked as implemented in the kep.yaml file after code PRs are merged and the feature gates are removed.

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Nov 10, 2024

Please note that KEPs targeting stable need to have the status field marked as implemented in the kep.yaml file after code PRs are merged and the feature gates are removed.

Thank you @jenshu,

Filed a PR: #4959

@Tal-or
Copy link
Contributor

Tal-or commented Nov 24, 2024

Hello @rashansmith,

Wanted to make sure the blog: kubernetes/website#48578 review is not missed for this release cycle.
If anything else is needed from my side, please let me know

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. kind/kep Categorizes KEP tracking issues and PRs modifying the KEP directory lead-opted-in Denotes that an issue has been opted in to a release sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. stage/stable Denotes an issue tracking an enhancement targeted for Stable/GA status tracked/no Denotes an enhancement issue is NOT actively being tracked by the Release Team
Projects
Status: Removed from Milestone
Status: Tracked for code freeze
Status: Implemented
Development

No branches or pull requests