Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

celebrating orgs with full time maintainers #263

Open
3 tasks
parispittman opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
3 tasks

celebrating orgs with full time maintainers #263

parispittman opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
committee/steering Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee.

Comments

@parispittman
Copy link
Contributor

Problem Statement

hiring and retaining full time maintainers (those who are contributing at 75% or higher of their time) should be celebrated because it's hard for managers and businesses to justify this kind of contribution.

Proposed Solutions

  • add a page on k8s.dev/orgs with company logos who currently employ full time OWNERs to areas of Kubernetes
  • add booth signage to companies who meet this criteria at kubecon/cloudnative cons (thanks to @eddiezane for this idea and adding some in Detroit!)

Cost

n/a; professional signage could have a cost for #2 or we could allow companies to do their own

Open Questions

  • How do we know for sure that someone is full time on the project? [possible solution: add names and/or handles publicly or privately, community moderation, private emails to steering@, steering reviews on a yearly basis as part of annual reports, etc]

Next Steps

  • discuss at an upcoming steering committee meeting
  • PR a prototype into the k8s.dev website repo
@parispittman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@caniszczyk is going to ask marketing to help with this for kubecon and setting up a program that could help with this

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 21, 2023
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale

How do we know for sure that someone is full time on the project? [possible solution: add names and/or handles publicly or privately, community moderation, private emails to steering@, steering reviews on a yearly basis as part of annual reports, etc]

That's a good question, we could survey the contributor mailinglist periodically perhaps?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 21, 2023
@BenTheElder BenTheElder mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2023
5 tasks
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

We discussed this again at the chairs and tech leads meeting today.

It seemed like we have two threads:

  1. Celebrating employing and supporting contribution / maintainers,
  2. A tangent on the LetsEncrypt style promoting project / infra sponsors, which we should probably suggest / do through CNCF as an addition to the Infra Credits program (AWS, GCP, Equinix, Fastly, ...).

For both it would be nice to do something like this photo by @eddiezane

I think we should bring up both with CNCF to see what they're interested in doing because if we get support for 2) which is more clearly tied to existing programs then it might make sense to expand it to also cover 1) which is what this issue originally brought up.

But if not, I think the organization can do something ourselves.

A couple possibilities were brought up today, e.g. devstats, but there's concern about including everyone.

Currently I'd suggest we ask for private feedback from [email protected] (all project members should be on this list) to tell us if they feel their employer supports them in contributing / should be recognized for this and which employer that is.

We can then either organize producing and distributing signs like this ourselves or through the CNCF, pending further feedback on that aspect.

@BenTheElder BenTheElder added the committee/steering Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee. label Jun 14, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 22, 2024
@BenTheElder BenTheElder removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Feb 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
committee/steering Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants