Label kubernetes.io/cluster-trust-bundle-version not documented

[sftim]

This is a Bug Report

Problem:
Prompted by https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/3913/files#r1142389497, I'm suggesting we might
need to document the label kubernetes.io/cluster-trust-bundle-version

Proposed Solution:

1. Check if this label is used in any shipped Kubernetes code. If it is, even behind a feature gate, we must document it.
2. If so, get it registered and documented.

Page to Update:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/labels-annotations-taints/

Additional Information:
/language en

[Shubham82]

/sig auth

[stlaz]

/triage accepted
in case the enhancement merges and the label is added

[coder12git]

/assign

[coder12git]

Hey @sftim , according to above comment, seems like i can work on this issue only when this PR merges, is it?

[sftim]

Here's what we need to do, right now:

1. Check if this label is used in any shipped Kubernetes code. If it is, even behind a feature gate, we must document it.
2. If so, get it registered and documented.

Maybe the first step ends with finding that the label isn't used; if so, we're done (for now).

[Ritikaa96]

The PR has been merged but as per my search results there hasn't been any implementation of this label in the shipped code yet.
One occurrence is in the KEP it self.

[sftim]

As a final cleanup, I suggest opening a PR to change the KEP.

Revise kubernetes.io/cluster-trust-bundle-version to be, eg, k8s.example/cluster-trust-bundle-version and check that the use in the KEP is just an example. Then we're done done.

[Ritikaa96]

Hi, so is it just a suggestion or we can raise PR to change the label in the KEP-3257?
I'll be happy to make the change just need a confirmation to change page: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-auth/3257-cluster-trust-bundles

[sftim]

Raising a PR sounds fine @Ritikaa96

[Ritikaa96]

As per discussion this label is being updated in the KEP itself in PR: kubernetes/enhancements#4971

[Ritikaa96]

Hi @sftim as per kubernetes/enhancements#4971 discussion this was used for example only so are we still waiting for its future usage?

[Ritikaa96]

I rechecked and didn't find a usage too so can we close this?

[sftim]

@Ritikaa96 do you recommend closing the issue?

[Ritikaa96]

@Ritikaa96 do you recommend closing the issue?

Hi @sftim I dont think i can decide that it is needed to be closed. I'm asking if there is anything pending for this issue before it get resolved?