Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Channels and Stations should have a standard naming convention #82

Open
kujaku11 opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Channels and Stations should have a standard naming convention #82

kujaku11 opened this issue Mar 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@kujaku11
Copy link
Owner

Channels and Station should have a standard naming convention, something like FDSN has.

Stations can be more relaxed maybe 8 characters max of alphanumeric, starting with a couple of letter representing the survey and a couple of numbers and or letters representing the station number "CL01" or "CAS04".

Channels can be a little more strict. Should be something like {measurement_type}{component}{channel_number}. The traditional form is x-north and y-east, for component, but with various dipole setups this could be relaxed

measurement types:

  • E: electric
  • H or B: magnetic
  • auxiliary channels could follow FDSN?

Once a standard is set then we can validate the channels and station ID's in a more uniform fashion. But I think this is for the larger community to decide.

@kujaku11 kujaku11 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant