Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supports single UDAF fallback #577

Closed
richox opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Supports single UDAF fallback #577

richox opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature required Functionalities must have stale

Comments

@richox
Copy link
Collaborator

richox commented Sep 18, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
currently we have completed supports to UDF/UDAF fallbacks. but UDAF is not yet supported. a HashAggregate with UDAF will fallback to spark.
in most cases, the bottlesnack of an aggregation is grouping. if we can only fallback the accumulating with UDAF, we may achieve more performance profits than fallback the whole operator.

Describe the solution you'd like
implement UDAF fallback. we have to consider how to reduce the number of JNI calls (one call per record is absolutely slow).

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@richox richox added the feature required Functionalities must have label Sep 19, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2025

This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jan 5, 2025
Copy link

This issue was closed because it has been inactive for 14 days since being marked as stale.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature required Functionalities must have stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant