Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DLIB + Poisson Blending for the Mask #117

Open
ghost opened this issue Mar 6, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

DLIB + Poisson Blending for the Mask #117

ghost opened this issue Mar 6, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 6, 2016

Hi guys,

I was giving a try to ofxFace Tracker and was wondering if using DLIB would not be more faster with a poisson blending of the mask ?

eg: https://matthewearl.github.io/2015/07/28/switching-eds-with-python/

and for the face landmarking with DLIB, http://blog.dlib.net/2014/08/real-time-face-pose-estimation.html

Have u ever considered to add DLIB ?

Cheers,
Luc Michalski

@genekogan
Copy link
Collaborator

the results from those links definitely look really impressive. i'd love to try to integrate them into ofxLearn at some point, but i haven't updated it in a while and may not free up for a little while longer. but it definitely might be time to update the version of dlib for ofxLearn, so these might be a good next step. have you been using them?

@antimodular
Copy link

check out ofxDLib for some tracking examples:
https://github.com/roymacdonald/ofxDLib

@kylemcdonald
Copy link
Owner

@ofZach has reported more robust initialization from dlib than FaceTracker. my ideal would be to have a swappable backend for ofxFaceTracker that allows you to send a flag to setup() that specifies which tracker you want to use. none of the public-facing ofxFaceTracker methods are FaceTracker-specific so it might be complex to implement but shouldn't break anyone's code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants