This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Discussion has been moved to issue #34
A draft PR to figure out what needs to be actually done on the equisolve side to add TorchScript support. This will be probably splitted int smaller sub PRs
Replacing numpy operations with equistore operations in our transformers/estimators
I think it would be easier for now if we limit ourselves to the forward functions, since in the fit function operations happen that are cannot be completely reproduced with equistore operations and I am not sure how to split them into equistore.operations.
Add optional torch.nn.Module inheritance on the transformers and estimators
Add this inheritance class if torch is installed. That way we can get a class that is torch.jit.compile'able in case TensorMaps with torch.tensor's are used. In the cases where torch is not installed or a TensorMap with numpy.ndarray's are used, then at least it can be dumped as pickle object.
Removing numpy torch layer
numpy
andtorch
folder, because they get merged by using equistore.operations📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://equisolve--24.org.readthedocs.build/en/24/