Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple zones #11

Open
nderjung opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Multiple zones #11

nderjung opened this issue Nov 26, 2019 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nderjung
Copy link

A suggested improvement is the ability to write/update multiple zones, e.g. test.com and test.co.

Likely would need an revamp of the configuration management of the system, reading from a configuration file (in addition to) CLI arguments.

@eabili0
Copy link
Contributor

eabili0 commented Jan 9, 2020

Hi @nderjung! Sorry for the late response. I think it would be a very welcomed feature.

While we prioritize it's implementatation, if you are using the provided docker image on a swarm or kubernetes cluster, you could easily run a new bindman-dns-bind9 container configured to manage the second zone.

Thanks!

@werberson werberson added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 9, 2020
@nderjung
Copy link
Author

nderjung commented Jan 11, 2020

Hi @abilioesteves, no worries.

A valid solution but unfortunately this still doesn't meet my requirements. The problem stems from wanting to having a single instance of traefik which has multiple ingress zones. It is currently possible to configure traefik to use bindman (via lego). At present, bindman represents the only true open-source zone controller for traefik and thus a natural choice (for me anyway).

@eabili0
Copy link
Contributor

eabili0 commented Jan 13, 2020

Got it. Once we release this new feature, I will let you know here. Thanks!

@werberson werberson self-assigned this Apr 20, 2020
@nderjung
Copy link
Author

Hey! Any updates on this feature?

@eabili0
Copy link
Contributor

eabili0 commented Jul 27, 2020

@nderjung, sorry but we weren't able to prioritize this issue until now. Will give it more focus. You can expect an update by the end of this week. But, if you feel up to it, we would very much welcome your contribution to this issue. I can help ease your introduction to the project's code, if you need any assistance.

The changes may also impact our API, which is in another repository (we adopted a "plug and play" sort of architecture).

Cheers!

@eabili0
Copy link
Contributor

eabili0 commented Oct 15, 2020

@werberson, it looks like with this lib https://github.com/caarlos0/env we can solve this issue more easily. What do you think?

@eabili0 eabili0 closed this as completed Oct 15, 2020
@eabili0 eabili0 reopened this Oct 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants