Replies: 1 comment
-
Answer generated by a 🤖 AnswerI understand your concern about the potential for malicious prompt injection in LangChain. You're worried that someone could potentially introduce harmful components through "invisible prompts" that could be combined in a harmful way. In response to your concern, I'd like to explain how LangChain mitigates such risks. We use predefined constants and instructions for formatting the JSON blob, such as Furthermore, these instructions emphasize that the JSON blob should contain only a single action, which further limits the potential for misuse. We also use TypeScript and eslint rules to enforce code quality and security. Additionally, every pull request (PR) goes through a rigorous code review process before it's merged, providing another layer of security against potential threats. However, it's important to note that while these measures significantly reduce the risk, no system can be 100% immune to all potential threats. We continuously work on improving the security of LangChain and welcome any suggestions or contributions from our user community. If you believe this explanation clarifies the safety measures in place and is not covered in our existing documentation, we encourage you to make a pull request to update the documentation. This will help other users understand the security aspects of LangChain better. Sources
This response is meant to be useful, save you time, and share context. It is not meant to be a precise solution, but rather a starting point for your own research. Help me be more useful! Please leave a 👍 if this is helpful and 👎 if it is irrelevant. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Couldn't someone merge in a malicious prompt injection?
Maybe not in a single PR, but with components that have "invisible prompts" (Every tool description is sent as part of the "system" prompt) a specific combination of those prompts can be evil.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions