Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An in-range update of babel-types is breaking the build 🚨 #25

Open
greenkeeper bot opened this issue Apr 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

An in-range update of babel-types is breaking the build 🚨 #25

greenkeeper bot opened this issue Apr 7, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@greenkeeper
Copy link

greenkeeper bot commented Apr 7, 2017

Version 6.24.1 of babel-types just got published.

Branch Build failing 🚨
Dependency babel-types
Current Version 6.23.0
Type devDependency

This version is covered by your current version range and after updating it in your project the build failed.

As babel-types is “only” a devDependency of this project it might not break production or downstream projects, but “only” your build or test tools – preventing new deploys or publishes.

I recommend you give this issue a high priority. I’m sure you can resolve this 💪


Status Details
  • bitHound - Dependencies 2 failing dependencies. Details

  • bitHound - Code No failing files. Details

  • continuous-integration/travis-ci/push The Travis CI build passed Details

Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 8, 2017

Version 6.25.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Aug 16, 2017

Version 6.26.0 just got published.

Your tests are still failing with this version. Compare the changes 🚨

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants