Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shunts in restoration: fail to require restoration #51

Open
noahrhodes opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Shunts in restoration: fail to require restoration #51

noahrhodes opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@noahrhodes
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently shunts are "shedable" devices, like loads.

Damaged devices are all required to be repaired, but this does not apply to shunts. Shunts are also not in the objective function, so there is no incentive to restore them. As a result, shunts are left disabled, unless required for feasibility.

In particular, for a DC formulation shunts are left disabled even in the final time period.

Should shunts to be added to the objective function?

@ccoffrin
Copy link
Member

My initial thoughts.

Shunts that have an impact to active power balance should be added to the objective function for restoring active power.

I think it's best to leave restoration status out of the objective function and leave it a feasibility-only criteria for some components combined with a "restore all" requirement in the last time step.

In the case of the DC formulation we would expect the shunts to always be restored after 100% of load is met, due to a "restore all" constraint but it is ok that it does not understand the feasibility requirements of shunts. That is a fundamental limitation of the model.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants