Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calling having() with a Closure throws error #49749

Closed
Ken-vdE opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Calling having() with a Closure throws error #49749

Ken-vdE opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Ken-vdE
Copy link
Contributor

Ken-vdE commented Jan 19, 2024

Laravel Version

10

PHP Version

8.3

Database Driver & Version

No response

Description

When calling having() on a Builder with a Closure as a parameter, without previously calling having() with a column, throws an error because addNestedHavingQuery() does count($this->havings) which expects $this->havings to be countable (and it's null).

TypeError: count(): Argument #1 ($value) must be of type Countable|array, null given

Steps To Reproduce

see description

@crynobone
Copy link
Member

Hey there, thanks for reporting this issue.

We'll need more info and/or code to debug this further. Can you please create a repository with the command below, commit the code that reproduces the issue as one separate commit on the main/master branch and share the repository here?

Please make sure that you have the latest version of the Laravel installer in order to run this command. Please also make sure you have both Git & the GitHub CLI tool properly set up.

laravel new bug-report --github="--public"

Do not amend and create a separate commit with your custom changes. After you've posted the repository, we'll try to reproduce the issue.

Thanks!

@Ken-vdE
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ken-vdE commented Jan 24, 2024

Doing what you asked and writing the test to zoom in on the issue caused me to figure out the underlying problem.
I was calling having() with a \Closure but I was not calling any other having()s within that closure.
So, when the havingNested() method stepped into addNestedHavingQuery(), no $query->havings had been set.
That threw the TypeError.

I've expanded the condition determining to call or not call the inner having('column') to outside of the main having(\Closure), so when no having('column') is called, neither is the having(\Closure)

@Ken-vdE Ken-vdE closed this as completed Jan 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants