You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Under section 5 only requirements for Identity Providers are defined but normally an IdP uses Entity Support Category not Entity Category. Is this per design or only a mistake? Pal Axelsson.
Comment from Rhys Smith: "normally an IdP uses Entity Support Category not Entity Category" - is correct, but only by coincidence. An entity that has a specific categorisation has an entity category. It just so happens that so far, all categorisations have been for SPs, and so the IdPs have the ESC. This is a categorisation about an IdP, so it's right the IdP has an EC. If there was a corresponding ESC, it would be assigned to the SP that supports that IdP EC. Propose dropping ECS text.
Under section 5 only requirements for Identity Providers are defined but normally an IdP uses Entity Support Category not Entity Category. Is this per design or only a mistake? Pal Axelsson.
Comment from Rhys Smith: "normally an IdP uses Entity Support Category not Entity Category" - is correct, but only by coincidence. An entity that has a specific categorisation has an entity category. It just so happens that so far, all categorisations have been for SPs, and so the IdPs have the ESC. This is a categorisation about an IdP, so it's right the IdP has an EC. If there was a corresponding ESC, it would be assigned to the SP that supports that IdP EC. Propose dropping ECS text.
Comment from Peter Schober: https://refeds.org/category/hide-from-discovery is an(other) existing Entity Category for IDPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: