You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Does arbitrary list of endNodes makes sense? Since there is no relation between, they can be on opposite sides of the graph and that would result in basically endNodes.size searches that could as well be separate searches. Unless only connected nodes ware valid or something like that.
As abstract properties, something like any node within maximum cost from endNode would make some sense. That would probably require full search and then backtracking till we find node that exceeds the specified cost.
See discussion and proposed implementation here, #7 (comment)
Ideally, this kind of goal could be specified by an explicit set of nodes or abstract properties.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: