We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*** CID 160919: Concurrent data access violations (GUARDED_BY_VIOLATION) /lightblue-rest/common/src/main/java/com/redhat/lightblue/rest/RestConfiguration.java: 70 in com.redhat.lightblue.rest.RestConfiguration.getSavedSearchCache()()
64 65 public static DataSourcesConfiguration getDatasources() { 66 return datasources; 67 } 68 69 public static SavedSearchCache getSavedSearchCache() { >>> CID 160919: Concurrent data access violations (GUARDED_BY_VIOLATION) >>> Accessing "com.redhat.lightblue.rest.RestConfiguration.savedSearchCache" without holding lock "RestConfiguration.class". Elsewhere, "com.redhat.lightblue.rest.RestConfiguration.savedSearchCache" is accessed with "RestConfiguration.class" held 3 out of 4 times. 70 SavedSearchCache c=savedSearchCache; 71 if(c==null) { 72 synchronized(RestConfiguration.class) { 73 if(savedSearchCache==null) { 74 try { 75 savedSearchCache=new SavedSearchCache(getFactory().getCrudConfiguration().getSavedSearch());
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
*** CID 160919: Concurrent data access violations (GUARDED_BY_VIOLATION)
/lightblue-rest/common/src/main/java/com/redhat/lightblue/rest/RestConfiguration.java: 70 in com.redhat.lightblue.rest.RestConfiguration.getSavedSearchCache()()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: