Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Manage /29 subnets instead of /32 subnets #9

Open
sbaerlocher opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Manage /29 subnets instead of /32 subnets #9

sbaerlocher opened this issue Nov 16, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@sbaerlocher
Copy link

We have a whole /29 subnet as floating IP address, with the controller only the first address of the /29 block can be connected to a Kubernetes service, the rest of the addresses from the block are not available and cannot be connected to another Kubernetes service.

Is it possible for the controller to bind the remaining addresses individually to another Kubernetes service?

@msiegenthaler
Copy link
Member

Honestly I'm not sure if that is possible from the cloudscale side. I think you can only assign the whole block to a one server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants