You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I installed mean 0.6.1 for a new project and having used the 0.5.5 until now, the changes were somewhat overwhelming. The major change was that the 'core' packages were now part of node_modules. I rely much on what these packages do and almost always extend the functionality by modifying these files.
Is it worth having an option during 'mean init' that asks the developer if he wants these packages to be present in packages/contrib and if so, do the following:
Move the meanio-* packages to packes/contrib/
Remove their dependency from package.json
Remove the reference to packages/contrib from .gitignore
Show a warning to the developer that upstream changes to these packages cannot be updated automatically and have to be patched manually from http://github.com/linnovate
P.S.: Currently, the mean-cli changes the package directory name to the app name from the cmd prompt, however the package name is still meanStarter. Is it not possible to replace the package name to the app name as well? (I'll try to submit a PR for this, when I get time)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I installed mean 0.6.1 for a new project and having used the 0.5.5 until now, the changes were somewhat overwhelming. The major change was that the 'core' packages were now part of
node_modules
. I rely much on what these packages do and almost always extend the functionality by modifying these files.Is it worth having an option during 'mean init' that asks the developer if he wants these packages to be present in
packages/contrib
and if so, do the following:meanio-*
packages topackes/contrib/
package.json
packages/contrib
from.gitignore
P.S.: Currently, the mean-cli changes the package directory name to the app name from the cmd prompt, however the package name is still meanStarter. Is it not possible to replace the package name to the app name as well? (I'll try to submit a PR for this, when I get time)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: