Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] read_only mode prevent plugin installation (to be confirmed) #329

Closed
1 task done
jehon opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

[BUG] read_only mode prevent plugin installation (to be confirmed) #329

jehon opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@jehon
Copy link

jehon commented Oct 4, 2024

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

When running docker with read_only = true, plugins are impossible to install:
neither work:

  • check for update (should install the default plugins)
  • install plugin

Expected Behavior

When running "check for update", the plugins should come up "magically". They don't.

I think that in read_only mode either:

  • the plugin folder need to be mounted from external, to allow writing in it
  • the plugins impact some file somewhere

Anyway, I bit of documentation?

Steps To Reproduce

  1. start the docker as documented, with the read_only flag
  2. go to search
  3. bottom right: search plugins
  4. use "check for update"
  5. the list does not fill in
    In non-read-only mode, the list fill in.

Environment

- OS: Linux Ubuntu
- How docker service was installed: snap

CPU architecture

x86-64

Docker creation

docker compose:

  qbittorrent:
    image: lscr.io/linuxserver/qbittorrent:latest
    tmpfs:
      - /run:exec
    read_only: true # => prevent plugin installation
    environment:
      WEBUI_PORT: 8080
    expose:
      - 8080

Container logs

nothing shown except normal startup
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@j0nnymoe
Copy link
Member

j0nnymoe commented Oct 4, 2024

This is what I would expect to happen if you aren't mounting any external volumes.
No need to add additional documentation to the readme as read only is "best effort" support with our containers, all explained here: https://docs.linuxserver.io/misc/read-only/

@jehon jehon closed this as completed Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants