Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] Allow running transmission with custom IO priority (ionice) #269

Closed
1 task done
roobre opened this issue Dec 10, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed
1 task done

[FEAT] Allow running transmission with custom IO priority (ionice) #269

roobre opened this issue Dec 10, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@roobre
Copy link

roobre commented Dec 10, 2023

Is this a new feature request?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Wanted change

I would like to be able to set a custom (in my case, lower) IO priority for the transmission process.

Reason for change

Serving torrent files can be quite an IO demanding task, specially on mechanical drives as due to the fragmented nature of torrents, seeking is very likely to occur in large amounts. This can make transmission a quite disruptive workload to run next to others.

Setting a lower IO priority (higher IO niceness value) can potentially help with this.

Proposed code change

We could allow users to define IONICE_CLASS and IONICE_LEVEL environment variables, which could be used as arguments to ionice's -c and -n in the /etc/s6-overlay/s6-rc.d/svc-transmission/run script. Alternatively, a oneshot service could also be used to ionice the transmission PID after it has started.

Copy link

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@roobre
Copy link
Author

roobre commented Jan 11, 2024

OP will happily provide more feedback if asked 😁

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 13, 2024
Copy link

This issue is locked due to inactivity

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 13, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants