You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We slice away invariants which are not related to the properties of interest
We should probably treat subrange declarations on locals and outputs as these types of invariants
But these invariants should be handled by the base and inductive step processes rather than the invariant generation process. These are things we expect to be true and perhaps useful, so we want them checked quickly. Invariant generation is more speculative and takes longer to run.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
JKind should support proposed invariants, e.g.
--%INVARIANT inv0;
These are slightly different than properties:
But these invariants should be handled by the base and inductive step processes rather than the invariant generation process. These are things we expect to be true and perhaps useful, so we want them checked quickly. Invariant generation is more speculative and takes longer to run.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: