You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
provide a user flag to specify the precision of rationals.
I'm thinking: -precision INT
the INT argument will produce the underlying fraction if the argument is 0 or N places of precision in a decimal format (up to some reasonable level, like 9). I think we should default N to 3 so it mimics current behavior by default.
Notes:
we used to provide a printout of the fractions that represented rationals but it became very hard to relate two values in a CEX (i.e. is 4388234/2342 > 2378823/273 ) which was easy to do for a couple of values but tedious for numerous values.
loss of precision in the current method has its own drawbacks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
provide a user flag to specify the precision of rationals.
I'm thinking: -precision INT
the INT argument will produce the underlying fraction if the argument is 0 or N places of precision in a decimal format (up to some reasonable level, like 9). I think we should default N to 3 so it mimics current behavior by default.
Notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: