-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DM-41711: Upgrade QuantumGraphExecutionReport to handle multiple overlapping graphs #294
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
dcc76a8
amend for edits for QPG
eigerx 998a60a
Add a pipetask report option for the QuantumProvenanceGraph
eigerx ec725df
Separate and pydantify printing QuantumProvenanceGraph.Summary object
eigerx 1383e59
Change not_attempted to unknown, published to visible and unpublished…
eigerx 205e451
Use butler collections and where options
eigerx 134a3ae
Make add_new_graph and resolve_duplicates private methods and require…
eigerx d37fa73
Clean up and document
eigerx 53d339a
Add check for graphs passed out of order and clarify docs
eigerx File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
Upgrade QuantumGraphExecutionReport to handle multiple overlapping graphs. | ||
|
||
Update the `pipetask report` command-line interface to accommodate the new | ||
`QuantumProvenanceGraph`. This allows for resolving outcomes of processing over | ||
multiple attempts (and associated graphs) over the same dataquery, providing | ||
information on recoveries, persistent issues and mismatch errors. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure why it wasn't this way before, but doesn't this function need the LSST style docstring with PARAMETERS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No because click formats this string as help text and doesn't understand numpydoc.