Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make resulting RDF graph valid (in respect to qSKOS) - View classes and concepts as different, but related ontologies. #26

Open
rue-a opened this issue Nov 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request illogicality Something is not consistent, reasonable, wise, or practical

Comments

@rue-a
Copy link
Contributor

rue-a commented Nov 3, 2022

FromqSKOS GitHub Page:
"qSKOS(https://github.com/cmader/qSKOS) is a tool for finding quality issues in SKOS vocabularies. It can be used as command line tool or API. For release information please see the changelog."

A service to check a certain graph against the metrics of qSKOS is available at SKOS Play!

Current versions of exported graphs fail, with the issue being having disconnected clusters in the same SKOS Concept Scheme. These clusters are the harmonized concept and the harmonized classes, which are both part of the same concept scheme, but are not connected over SKOS properties (which is intended).

In my eyes, a reasonable way to fix this, would be to view the classes and concepts as two different, but related vocabularies, and accordingly provide two concept schemes.

@rue-a rue-a added enhancement New feature or request illogicality Something is not consistent, reasonable, wise, or practical labels Nov 3, 2022
@rue-a rue-a changed the title Make resulting RDF graph valid (in respect to qSKOS) Make resulting RDF graph valid (in respect to qSKOS) - View classes and concepts as different, but related ontologies. Nov 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request illogicality Something is not consistent, reasonable, wise, or practical
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant