You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, everyone,
I want to use Deepxde to compute a problem with a relatively sizeable geometric domain (300m x 100m). Many training points and more extended training costs are required without linear scaling of the geometric field. I have used linear scaling for the geometric domain question (scaled down by a factor of 100).
Is there any relevant paper that discusses whether it is correct and feasible to perform the linear scaling method in this way?
Thanks.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello, everyone,
I want to use Deepxde to compute a problem with a relatively sizeable geometric domain (300m x 100m). Many training points and more extended training costs are required without linear scaling of the geometric field. I have used linear scaling for the geometric domain question (scaled down by a factor of 100).
Is there any relevant paper that discusses whether it is correct and feasible to perform the linear scaling method in this way?
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions