You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be useful to parallelize all of the code, since parallelized code can still be run on a single processor. We can get rid of glrm altogether, or keep it for pedagogical purposes. For massive datasets, it currently takes forever to run stuff like observations() and we can turn df2array into df2sharedarray in one shot.
Specializing on the new shareGLRM type, which is a subtype of the AbstractGLRM type, should make it easier and cleaner to parallelize larger swaths of the codebase.
I think it would be useful to parallelize all of the code, since parallelized code can still be run on a single processor. We can get rid of
glrm
altogether, or keep it for pedagogical purposes. For massive datasets, it currently takes forever to run stuff likeobservations()
and we can turndf2array
intodf2sharedarray
in one shot.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: