You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 18, 2023. It is now read-only.
Are there any plans to update Dai to be ERC20 compliant with regards to symbol and name? The current implementation has them as bytes32, which becomes a pain with contracts/front-ends to have to handle Dai separately from every token that returns string.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1 Calling ERC20 symbol() or name() on the DAI address from within a solidity contract function seems to cause a revert() if using a recent solc compiler.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Are there any plans to update Dai to be ERC20 compliant with regards to
symbol
andname
? The current implementation has them as bytes32, which becomes a pain with contracts/front-ends to have to handle Dai separately from every token that returns string.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: