You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
from Ron E:
You will probably want to leave the box and leakage damping terms in. For simplicity just use the same vented box model with Qa(bsorption), Ql(eakage) and Qp(ort), with Qp set to very low value (e.g. 1e-6)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
maqifrnswa
changed the title
Include loss/leakage in model
Include loss/leakage in model & book
Mar 8, 2016
Can our program tell the difference between acoustic resistances from Rabsorption Rport Rleak?
Small says that acoustic losses, are actually frequency dependent. However, when added all together, the "look" like just leakage loss, so you can model them all simply as leakage. But if we can measure them, we probably should use them, but generate a Qb (which, for practical purposes, everyone just calls Ql since that apparently dominates)
from Ron E:
You will probably want to leave the box and leakage damping terms in. For simplicity just use the same vented box model with Qa(bsorption), Ql(eakage) and Qp(ort), with Qp set to very low value (e.g. 1e-6)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: