Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Interesting. Can you clarify what kind of transactions these are? If these stay the same, I would guess, these might be:
If these, however, are transient(i.e. they might disappear between calls), then it is in an error in Nordea and/or gocardless and should really be reported to them. EIther way, we can still remove these(of course), in a manner you suggest(for example). Realistically, though, we cannot possibly work around every misbehavior of thousands of banks. So, if this really looks like changing between calls to Gocardless/Nordigen, it should be fixed in there. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Come to think of it, I really see no benefit in ever importing transactions with dates in the future. There is the issue of possible difference in dates depending on timezones, or even the system running ynabber having an out-of sync clock(or wrong timezone). But I assume these would be eventually be imported anyway so it is not a big loss. The out-of-sync clock, if by huge margin, might be a problem but really ought to be fixed anyway. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for bringing this up, I appreciate it. I made an issue from this discussion with a fix: #73 Instead of making it a config option, we filter out anything that's in the future or older than 5 years. I hope that works for you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not sure where to post ideas, but here I go :)
Some banks, in this case Nordea DK seems to occasionally have a 'bookingDate' and 'valueDate' set in the future, which returns in an error when sending the request to the YNAB API:
Idea: A new config option to automatically filter out dates in the future
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions