New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

@atcute/bluesky types pretend to be @atcute/client? #26

Closed

mihailik opened this issue Feb 3, 2025 · 1 comment

Contributor

mihailik commented Feb 3, 2025

The type definitions inside @atcute/bluesky package claim to define types in a different package

Owner

mary-ext commented Feb 3, 2025

They're correct, @atcute/bluesky, @atcute/ozone and @atcute/whitewind adds their type definitions to @atcute/client/lexicons

mary-ext closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment