You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have multiple related executables that share part of a name, but the names are not exactly the same. Additionally they contain useless prefixes & suffixes that are not needed in the label.
The binaries have a format like this: ${useless_prefix}_${common_name}_${some_differing_suffix}_${useless_suffix}
e.g. zzz_my_lib_unittest_0, zzz_my_lib_unittest_1zzz_my_lib_componenttest_0.
Describe the solution you'd like
Something like groupByExecutableRegex where I could group/merge only by the common part that's relevant.
Describe alternatives you've considered
For my specific usecase those tests also share a common path segment for the source files, so a mergeByLabel option for groupBySource would work as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Checklist
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have multiple related executables that share part of a name, but the names are not exactly the same. Additionally they contain useless prefixes & suffixes that are not needed in the label.
The binaries have a format like this:
${useless_prefix}_${common_name}_${some_differing_suffix}_${useless_suffix}
e.g.
zzz_my_lib_unittest_0
,zzz_my_lib_unittest_1
zzz_my_lib_componenttest_0
.Describe the solution you'd like
Something like
groupByExecutableRegex
where I could group/merge only by the common part that's relevant.Describe alternatives you've considered
For my specific usecase those tests also share a common path segment for the source files, so a
mergeByLabel
option forgroupBySource
would work as well.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: