Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] “Sparse” peerings #33

Open
ShadowJonathan opened this issue Feb 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[FR] “Sparse” peerings #33

ShadowJonathan opened this issue Feb 27, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@ShadowJonathan
Copy link

What

Peerings with “sparse” status, an explicit opt in on both sides go allow a connection more low-throughput, high-latency, more unreliable, or with less duty cycles than the current pinecone peerings require.

Why

Primarily, iot devices, to allow for power savings, yet stay connected to the network at times, allowing peers at the other side of the sparse connection to queue up packets and send them through whenever the underlying transport allows.

Secondly, resiliency in unreliable conditions, where a peer wants to accept high-latency costs, at the benefit of not becoming disconnected from the network at large. (Think remote outposts in unfavourable weather conditions resulting in unreliable uplinks, or network operators in hostile environments requiring prolonged connectivity over intermittent outages)

@ShadowJonathan ShadowJonathan changed the title “Sparse” peerings [FR] “Sparse” peerings Feb 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant